A viral interview this week put a progressive congressional candidate on the defensive after she reaffirmed a controversial position on immigration that quickly drew criticism from commentators across the political spectrum.
During a podcast interview, former New York Times reporter and current Vox podcaster Astead Herndon pressed Democratic congressional candidate Darializa Avila Chevalier on past social media posts, including one in which she stated that “all deportation is wrong.”
Chevalier, a member of the Democratic Socialists of America backed by Zohran Mamdani, is challenging longtime Democratic incumbent Adriano Espaillat in an upper Manhattan congressional district. Polling has reportedly shown the race to be highly competitive.
The exchange gained attention online because Herndon repeatedly asked the candidate whether she still stood by her previous statement despite obvious questions about immigration enforcement and criminal conduct.
“I still want to ask about two tweets specifically because I think they are relevant to the race,” Herndon said before turning to the deportation issue.
He noted that some Democrats may support policies such as abolishing ICE but questioned whether voters would agree with a blanket opposition to all deportations.
When asked directly whether she still believed the statement, Chevalier replied without hesitation.
“That phrase, yes, I still believe that all deportations are wrong,” she said.
Herndon then sought clarification, asking whether that position applied even to individuals who entered the country illegally or committed crimes.
Chevalier responded by drawing a distinction between immigration violations and criminal offenses, arguing that illegal entry involves administrative law rather than criminal law.
But Herndon narrowed the question further, asking specifically about non-citizens convicted of crimes under U.S. law.
“Is the deportation of those people wrong?” he asked.
Chevalier answered yes.
She argued that individuals who have already gone through the criminal justice system should not face what she described as an additional punishment based on their place of birth.
According to Chevalier, deportation following incarceration amounts to a second penalty imposed after someone has already served their sentence.
She maintained that subjecting individuals to both the criminal justice system and the immigration system creates unequal treatment and conflicts with principles of fairness and equality.
The comments immediately generated strong reactions from commentators representing different political viewpoints.
Centrist journalist and podcaster Josh Barro shared the clip online and sharply criticized the position.
“These people are lunatics,” Barro wrote, arguing that Chevalier’s comments amounted to opposition to deporting even non-citizens convicted of serious crimes.
Meanwhile, New York Times opinion writer Rotimi Adeoye suggested the argument could create political difficulties for Democrats outside heavily Democratic areas.
“For the sake of every Democrat running outside deep-blue cities,” Adeoye wrote, “arguing that people who entered the country illegally and then committed serious felonies like rape or murder should not be deported because of concerns about the criminal justice system is very dumb to say.”
Criticism also came from the right.
Fox News commentator Guy Benson reacted to the interview by writing, “The future of the party is arriving.”
The controversy arrives as immigration remains one of the nation’s most contentious political issues. While advocates and critics continue to debate enforcement policies, border security, and the treatment of non-citizens, the interview highlighted just how wide the divide remains—not only between Republicans and Democrats, but within the Democratic coalition itself.
As the congressional race moves forward, Chevalier’s remarks are likely to remain a focal point in a campaign that increasingly reflects larger national debates over immigration, law enforcement, and the limits of progressive policy proposals.
[READ MORE: Kilmeade Questions Vance’s Criticism of Israel as Iran Deal Faces Growing Scrutiny]
