In a candid admission, a longtime aide to former President Joe Biden reportedly revealed that White House staff felt justified in taking “undemocratic” actions during his administration, believing that President Donald Trump posed an existential threat to American democracy.
This revelation emerged during an appearance by Axios reporter Alex Thompson on Fox News Sunday, where he discussed insights from his reporting on the former Biden administration.
Thompson described a prevailing mindset among unelected aides, who saw themselves as the true decision-makers, often shielding Biden from scrutiny and managing the presidency behind the scenes.
“If you believe — and I think a lot of these people do sincerely believe — that Donald Trump was and is an existential threat to democracy, you can rationalize anything, including sometimes doing undemocratic things,” Thompson stated.
The aide’s remarks suggest a troubling rationale for actions taken in the name of protecting democracy.
In one notable comment, the aide remarked that Biden “just had to win, and then he could disappear for four years,” implying that the president could step back while his staff handled the day-to-day operations.
“He’d only have to show proof of life every once in a while,” the aide added, emphasizing the tight control exercised by an inner circle of staff members over Biden’s schedule and public interactions.
This admission raises important questions about the nature of governance in a democracy and the lengths to which individuals might go when they perceive a significant threat.
Critics have long pointed to the tensions between security and democratic principles, and this incident illustrates the challenges faced by those in power when navigating such dilemmas.
The context of these remarks is significant, considering the intense political climate surrounding Trump and the 2020 election.
Many Democrats have characterized Trump’s presidency as a direct assault on democratic norms, leading to increased polarization and heightened vigilance among his opponents.
The aide’s comments also reflect broader concerns that had existed within the Biden administration about maintaining public trust while navigating a politically charged environment.
By acknowledging the reality of their actions, the administration may be attempting to explain its choices, even as it grapples with the implications of such a mindset.
The conversation around these choices will likely persist as the nation navigates its political future, raising fundamental questions about the nature of democracy itself and the responsibilities of those who govern.
In a democracy, the justification of actions, regardless of intent, must be scrutinized to ensure that the principles of governance remain intact.
This incident serves as a reminder of the ongoing struggle to uphold democratic values in an increasingly polarized landscape.
[READ MORE: Nancy Pelosi Says She Believes Rahm Emmanuel Will Run for Dem Nomination in 2028]
