In a pointed critique of his former colleagues at Fox News, Tucker Carlson has now reportedly expressed grave concerns about escalating military tensions between the United States and Iran.
Following Iran’s retaliatory missile strikes against Israel, Carlson took to social media to denounce what he termed the “warmongers” within the network, including prominent figures such as Sean Hannity, Mark Levin, and Rupert Murdoch.
Carlson’s comments came shortly after a series of Israeli airstrikes targeted Iranian military leaders and nuclear facilities. The strikes have heightened anxieties regarding potential U.S. involvement in the conflict.
Carlson accused his former colleagues of pushing the nation toward war with Iran, drawing a clear line between those advocating for military action and those striving for peace.
“The real divide isn’t between people who support Israel and those who support Iran or the Palestinians,” Carlson stated. “The real divide is between those who casually encourage violence, and those who seek to prevent it.”
He further elaborated that individuals calling for direct U.S. military intervention should be held accountable for their actions, emphasizing that they would eventually “have to answer for this.”
Earlier in the day, Carlson had also criticized President Donald Trump for his support of Israel’s military actions, arguing that the U.S. bears responsibility for the conflict’s escalation.
“While the American military may not have physically perpetrated the assault, years of funding and sending weapons to Israel undeniably place the U.S. at the center of these events,” he remarked. Carlson’s commentary reflects a growing frustration among some conservatives regarding American foreign policy and its implications.
As tensions continue to mount, Carlson’s remarks resonate with a segment of the American public increasingly wary of military entanglements abroad.
He framed the current situation as part of a broader narrative of complicity, suggesting that those in power cannot claim ignorance or distance from the consequences of their advocacy for military action.
The backlash against Carlson’s comments may also highlight the fracturing consensus within conservative circles regarding foreign policy.
As discussions of military engagement intensify, the debate over America’s role in the Israel-Iran conflict is likely to escalate, with Carlson’s criticisms serving as a focal point for ongoing discussions about war, peace, and accountability.
In this climate of uncertainty, Carlson’s statements serve as a stark reminder of the complexities surrounding U.S. foreign relations and the varying perspectives on the appropriate response to threats from Iran.
As the situation evolves, the implications for American diplomacy and military strategy remain significant, prompting calls for a reevaluation of the nation’s approach to international conflicts.
[READ MORE: Trump Celebrates After Major New Legal Win]
