Tribal leaders and local officials in Alaska’s North Slope reportedly expressed profound gratitude following the recent rollback of stringent federal restrictions on oil and gas development in the National Petroleum Reserve–Alaska (NPRA), a move that many see as restoring respect for local voices and economic priorities.
The Department of the Interior, alongside officials from the Environmental Protection Agency and the Department of Energy, announced the reversal during a visit to Utqiagvik.
The previous rules, implemented under the Biden administration, had closed off more than half of the NPRA’s 23 million acres to oil exploration and imposed strict limits on several million more acres, sparking opposition from Alaska Native corporations, tribal governments, and industry groups.
Josiah Patkotak, mayor of the North Slope Borough, welcomed the policy shift as a refreshing display of transparency and inclusion, contrasting it with what he described as the previous administration’s behind-the-scenes approach that excluded local stakeholders.
“That rule was announced after everybody got on the plane and flew out,” he noted, praising the new administration for engaging directly with the community.
Representatives from the Arctic Slope Regional Corporation underscored the importance of local self-determination, describing the earlier restrictions as undermining Indigenous governance and disregarding the input of those who live and work on the land.
Rex Rock Sr., the corporation’s president and CEO, said the community’s core demand remains clear: that North Slope Inupiat be central to all decisions affecting their ancestral lands.
Charles Lampe, president of the Kaktovik Inupiat Corporation, expressed frustration with environmental groups, suggesting their advocacy framed the community as adversaries during the previous rule-making process, deepening divisions and mistrust.
Interior Secretary Doug Burgum emphasized that the policy reversal aligns with the original congressional intent for the NPRA, aiming to balance responsible energy development with environmental stewardship.
He framed the change as a reaffirmation of Alaska’s role in meeting national energy needs and securing economic opportunities for local residents.
Supporters view the rollback not only as a boost to the regional economy but also as a meaningful shift toward empowering Indigenous communities in managing their resources.
They argue that the earlier restrictions prioritized environmental concerns at the expense of local well-being and economic independence.
Environmental advocates, however, caution that easing restrictions could threaten fragile ecosystems and contribute to broader climate challenges.
They warn that even lands outside the most restricted zones may be vulnerable to increased industrial activity.
For many on the North Slope, the decision offers hope for a future where their voices are heard, their sovereignty respected, and their economic prospects improved.
Whether this policy shift will endure beyond the current political climate remains uncertain, but it marks a significant moment in the ongoing debate over balancing development and conservation in Alaska’s vast wilderness.
[READ MORE: ABC’s Terry Moran Suspended After Anti-Trump Tirade]
