Nicole Shanahan, who previously served as the running mate for Robert F. Kennedy Jr., has now reportedly raised serious concerns about his decision-making process at the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS).
This speculation comes in the wake of President Donald Trump’s recent nomination of Dr. Casey Means to the position of Surgeon General, a decision that has drawn attention for its implications on Kennedy’s leadership and autonomy.
In a social media post on Wednesday, Shanahan expressed her bewilderment regarding the nomination, stating, “Yes, it’s very strange. Doesn’t make any sense.”
She elaborated that she had been promised that if she supported Kennedy in his Senate confirmation, neither Dr. Means nor her brother, Calley Means, would be appointed to roles within HHS.
Shanahan’s frustration is palpable as she questions whether Kennedy had misled her about the arrangements, leading to her claims that he may not be acting independently.
Yes, it’s very strange. Doesn’t make any sense. I was promised that if I supported RFK Jr. in his Senate confirmation that neither of these siblings would be working under HHS or in an appointment (and that people much more qualified would be). I don’t know if RFK very clearly… https://t.co/KDb5O5MvAM
— Nicole Shanahan (@NicoleShanahan) May 8, 2025
Shanahan’s comments specifically reference the involvement of Dr. Means and her brother, who was appointed as a special government employee in March.
This familial connection raises eyebrows, especially considering that Kennedy had previously indicated a desire for more qualified individuals to fill key positions in HHS. Shanahan’s assertion that “someone is controlling” Kennedy’s decisions points to a troubling narrative of external influence in political leadership, suggesting that he may be reporting to someone who is not President Trump.
Trump’s announcement about Dr. Casey Means was framed positively, highlighting her impressive credentials and outlining her role in working closely with Kennedy to implement a health agenda aimed at addressing the chronic disease epidemic in the U.S.
However, Shanahan’s remarks cast doubt on the sincerity of this collaboration.
She described the siblings as seemingly “artificial and aggressive,” likening them to “Manchurian assets,” a term that suggests they may be operating under undue influence.
The public and political observers are keenly interested in how this situation will unfold, particularly regarding Kennedy’s role and the overall direction of health policy under his leadership.
Shanahan’s comments have sparked broader discussions about the potential for outside forces to shape political decisions and influence the agenda of elected officials.
As the narrative continues to develop, it raises critical questions about the integrity of political alliances and the independence of leaders in government.
The implications of Shanahan’s claims could have significant effects on Kennedy’s ability to advance his health initiatives and maintain his political credibility in the weeks ahead.
[READ MORE: Trump Reveals New Name for Persian Gulf]
